THE biggest case for tokenised finance seems missing from our agenda: Capital mobility.

Aug 25, 2026

5 min read

Featured Posts

Social Bonds Illustrative Use-Of-Proceeds Case Studies Coronavirus

Jul 06, 2020

2 min read

Sustainable Banking Network (SBN) Creating Green Bond Markets

Jul 06, 2020

2 min read

Why is Inflation Making a Big Comeback After Being Absent for Decades in the U.S.?

Mar 24, 2022

7 min read

SC issues Corporate Governance Strategic Priorities 2021-2023

Mar 29, 2022

3 min read

THE biggest case for tokenised finance seems missing from our agenda: Capital mobility.

The real promise of tokenisation is in creating a digital version of assets that’s easier to move, pledge, reuse, and settle across markets. A token that can only be traded on an exchange is inert, whereas a token that functions as collateral changes how capital is mobilised.

Malaysia’s licensed digital asset activity is dominated by trading, with custody and issuance in small supporting roles. Without foundational plumbing, most tokenisation regimes fail because they just switch operational friction around instead of removing it.

Globally, institutional interest has been driven by several catalysts.

First, the approval of US spot Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024 brought crypto into the mainstream with a regulated product that’s familiar to investors. Pension funds, endowments and treasuries could gain exposure without taking direct custody risk.

Second, legislative milestones in the European Union (Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation, 2023), United States (Genius Act, 2025) and major financial centres (Dubai, Hong Kong, Singapore, London) turned regulatory uncertainty into an open path for corporate decision-makers.

Third, large crypto platforms began accepting tokenised money market funds (MMFs) and stablecoins as off-exchange collateral, allowing investors to access trading margin while continuing to earn yield on high-quality assets.

November 2025 became the tipping point when Binance formally accepted BlackRock’s tokenised MMF called BUIDL (following similar moves months earlier by KuCoin and Bybit with UBS’ uMINT fund, and Coinbase with USDC stablecoin).

In effect, the two biggest names in traditional and digital asset management came together to validate the working concept of tokenised collateral.

Collateral is the lifeblood of financial markets. When it moves slowly, capital is trapped; and when it moves quickly and efficiently, liquidity improves with fewer buffers needed, intraday funding costs fall, and cash drag is eliminated.

To explain further, when a financial instrument is tokenised as collateral, it is recognised in both “onchain” and “offchain” systems without unwinding the underlying asset position, benefiting buy-side and sell-side.

This is different from the current practice here of merely issuing tokens and waiting for investors to appear.

Banks aren’t latecomers, but are on the forefront: Societe Generale used its own bond tokens as collateral to borrow DAI stablecoins as early as 2021, while JPMorgan Chase launched a blockchain-based collateral settlement system back in 2023.

Today, the former accepts tokenised collateral for prime services and the latter posts it for CME requirements.

The next catalyst is where the traction truly develops. The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (covering nearly half of the world’s derivatives market) issued guidance under its Crypto Sprint initiative, pointing to a future where blockchains are treated as next-level collateral management infrastructure.

Eventually, post-trade ecosystems will “shift from holding collateral just-in-case, toward deploying it just-in-time” across platforms, locations, and counterparties.

The New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq are embedding it into their core operations, followed by the massive repo sector with US$4 trillion in daily volume.

Just last month, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corp piloted live trades of tokenised securities, including collateral transfers, with a full launch in October.

It’s counterpart Euroclear has already forged ahead with major milestones.

Malaysia can decide whether to take this capital-forward route in the next phase of global finance.

The nation’s settlement architecture is not specifically discussed in the Securities Commission Capital Market Masterplan 2026-2030, though local players have started launching tokenised MMFs.

At the asset level, the recent High Court ruling in Lee Ee Foong v Ong Seow Lee on debt repayment has sparked interest in how security interests will be legally perfected, prioritised, and enforced on digital assets; and whether banks can accept them as collateral within regulatory definition and standard commercial documentation.

Financial centres that build interoperable systems will attract institutional capital, as tokenisation “reshapes how money moves”.

Those who don’t, will be stuck with “digital silos” – locally tokenised assets will become harder to access, with limited diversity and valued at steep discounts, weakening firms’ ability to raise funds.

For emerging markets behind the tokenisation curve, it’s a strategic concern. If standards are set elsewhere, these markets will be consigned to “rule-takers” rather than “rule-makers”.

Assets will be tokenised on terms shaped by others, with domestic innovation routed through foreign vendors; and simply approving more licensed exchanges won’t help!

Since capital flows and docks on the rails that clear it fastest, we either build them or pay to use them.

Should our direct competitors succeed, Malaysia may confront a structural disadvantage of having to defend market sustainability without tech sovereignty.

Yet to put things in perspective, digital assets are only 1.6% of stock trading volume and 0.4% of listed securities’ market cap on Bursa Malaysia – still too small to justify sweeping policy changes.

Time will tell if all this is just noise, or if it’s a hidden symptom that capital has long since fled.

Edmund Yong is a director of the Generative AI Association of Malaysia and ambassador of the Global Blockchain Business Council founded in Davos. The views expressed here are the writer’s own.

Source: The case for tokenising collateral assets on our terms (Tuesday, 25 Aug 2026). The Star. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/business/insight/2026/08/25/the-case-for-tokenising-collateral-assets-on-our-terms

Disclaimer

The information provided in this report is of a general nature and has been prepared for information purposes only. It is not intended to constitute research or as advice for any investor. The information in this report is not and should not be construed or considered as an offer, recommendation or solicitation for investments. Investors are advised to make their own independent evaluation of the information contained in this report, consider their own individual investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs and should seek appropriate personalised financial advice from a qualified professional to suit individual circumstances and risk profile. The information contained in this report is prepared from data believed to be correct and reliable at the time of issuance of this report. While every effort is made to ensure the information is up-to-date and correct, Bond and Sukuk Information Platform Sdn Bhd (“the Company”) does not make any guarantee, representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the adequacy, accuracy, completeness, reliability or fairness of any such information contained in this report and accordingly, neither the Company nor any of its affiliates nor its related persons shall not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any consequences (including but not limited to any direct, indirect or consequential losses, loss of profits and damages) of any reliance thereon or usage thereof.

BIX ARTICLE

THE biggest case for tokenised finance seems missing from our agenda: Capital mobility.

Featured Posts

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

SC wants large firms to pursue dual listings