BIX ARTICLE
Why China is hesitant on global green leadership
Dec 03, 2025
|
6 min read
Featured Posts
Social Bonds Illustrative Use-Of-Proceeds Case Studies Coronavirus
Jul 06, 2020
|
2 min read
Sustainable Banking Network (SBN) Creating Green Bond Markets
Jul 06, 2020
|
2 min read
Why is Inflation Making a Big Comeback After Being Absent for Decades in the U.S.?
Mar 24, 2022
|
7 min read
SC issues Corporate Governance Strategic Priorities 2021-2023
Mar 29, 2022
|
3 min read
Heads of state (from left, front) Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi, Chinese Deputy Prime Minister Ding Xuexiang and Guyanese President Irfaan Ali attend the leaders’ roundtable on Nov 6 to launch the Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF) during the pre-COP Belém Climate Summit in Brazil. — AFP
|
Heads of state (from left, front) Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi, Chinese Deputy Prime Minister Ding Xuexiang and Guyanese President Irfaan Ali attend the leaders’ roundtable on Nov 6 to launch the Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF) during the pre-COP Belém Climate Summit in Brazil. — AFP
AHEAD of this year’s United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP30), China appeared keen to take on the mantle of a new global leader on climate change, stepping into the gap left by the United States’ withdrawal from the top spot under Donald Trump.
In trying to understand what China wants from this role, it’s worth examining three areas motivating Beijing to take over leadership and two others it is trying to avoid.
First, China is attempting to reshape climate talks along “tech and trade” lines. At COP30, it presented itself as a “clean tech” superpower that is ambitious, technologically capable and cooperative.
The country’s capacity for renewable energy generation has more than tripled in 10 years, reaching 1,876,646MW in 2024. Solar energy has shown astonishing growth: 20 times higher than in 2015.
In 2024, China, the world’s largest greenhouse gas emitter, invested US$290bil in renewable energy – that’s US$80bil more than the combined total of the European Union (EU), the United Kingdom and the United States.
Domestic energy planning
China needs to address its domestic energy planning for the world to achieve significant emissions reductions. Renewable energy is critical, particularly as the rapid scaling of artificial intelligence and data centres drives a surge in electricity consumption. China is shaping the global agenda in favour of low-carbon technologies and their global expansion.
A second priority for China in taking on global green leadership is using it to grow the country’s export economy.
China gains a trade advantage by making clean energy cheaper. Lower costs allow these clean technologies to access international markets easily.
Since 2018, China has shipped out close to US$1 trillion worth of batteries, solar components, electric vehicles (EVs) and wind power systems globally. But some of these industries are facing overcapacity, so China must find new markets for its products.
Its traditional markets, Europe and the United States, have recently added trade barriers, including tariffs on Chinese EVs and solar panels.
At COP30, China used global climate negotiations to set out its opposition to these barriers, positioning free trade in clean technologies as essential for reaching global climate goals. But they are also ideal for Chinese economic growth.
Shipping to other emerging markets is an alternative to these more established markets. China’s EVs exports to South-East Asia saw explosive growth in 2025.
Its new customers are large, energy-intensive economies such as Indonesia and India. China wants to keep them and everybody else committed to net-zero emissions to maximise its clean tech trade benefits.
Regional security is another. China hopes to increase its political power in countries and regions of strategic interest, such as via its economic and trade partnership, the Belt and Road Initiative, and also in the Pacific.
It has already increased its investments in new security allies, such the Solomon Islands and the Cook Islands.
To repackage this strategy under the name of climate change, China launched the China-Pacific Island Countries Climate Change Cooperation Centre in 2022. Addressing global climate change enables China to legitimise its involvement in these countries and regions.
China is being seen as stepping up to a leadership position on climate change. But assuming full leadership and historical responsibilities for climate change are beyond its comfort zone. China’s delegates entered COP30 meeting rooms being praised for new leadership, but Beijing is struggling to meet its current pledges.
The latest analysis suggests that its carbon emissions are falling slowly. The country’s emission reduction pledges, announced ahead of COP30, are regarded as insufficient.
Biggest threat
The biggest threat is its own economy – weak factory output, low consumer spending, high youth unemployment and lower state taxation to encourage growth.
Local governments have difficulties in financing the low-carbon economy, and their debts are accumulating.
It’s not clear whether China can fulfill its pledges by cutting emissions sharply, continue to subsidise its green energy industries and make significant economic investments in regional cooperation, all under its current weak economy.
So China does not want to lead as an advocate of deep emission cuts nor does it want to take on the mantle with other industrialised economies of accepting the historical responsibility for global climate change.
Analysis has shown that, despite being far behind the United States, China’s historical emissions since 1850 have overtaken those from the 27 EU member states.
The closer China comes to the United States’ traditional role, the more it will be expected to take historical responsibility for climate change.
China is not ready for that. It cannot reduce emissions significantly in a short timeframe under a weak economy. China sees itself as a developing country.
At COP30, one of the contentious issues was getting US$1.3 trillion per year in climate finance from public and private sources in the EU and other OECD economies.
China did not formally commit to supporting the US$1.3 trillion goal, disappointing the rest of the developing world.
The lack of commitment was not just a matter of money but the idea that China should be held responsible in the same terms as developed countries.
While it has provided a substantial amount of climate and clean energy finance to other developing countries, this was primarily driven by strategic and geopolitical considerations.
China also opposed the road map aimed at phasing out fossil fuels and declined to contribute to Brazil’s Tropical Forest Forever Facility, a mechanism for compensating countries for preserving tropical forests.
Clearly, China is leading the world in low-carbon technologies. It also believes that climate cooperation with developing nations will deliver trade and security benefits, and will continue to shape climate change talks along these lines. — The Jakarta Post/ANN
Alex Lo is a professor of environment at York St John University. The views expressed here are the writer’s own.
Article by ALEX LO
AHEAD of this year’s United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP30), China appeared keen to take on the mantle of a new global leader on climate change, stepping into the gap left by the United States’ withdrawal from the top spot under Donald Trump.
In trying to understand what China wants from this role, it’s worth examining three areas motivating Beijing to take over leadership and two others it is trying to avoid.
First, China is attempting to reshape climate talks along “tech and trade” lines. At COP30, it presented itself as a “clean tech” superpower that is ambitious, technologically capable and cooperative.
The country’s capacity for renewable energy generation has more than tripled in 10 years, reaching 1,876,646MW in 2024. Solar energy has shown astonishing growth: 20 times higher than in 2015.
In 2024, China, the world’s largest greenhouse gas emitter, invested US$290bil in renewable energy – that’s US$80bil more than the combined total of the European Union (EU), the United Kingdom and the United States.
Domestic energy planning
China needs to address its domestic energy planning for the world to achieve significant emissions reductions. Renewable energy is critical, particularly as the rapid scaling of artificial intelligence and data centres drives a surge in electricity consumption. China is shaping the global agenda in favour of low-carbon technologies and their global expansion.
A second priority for China in taking on global green leadership is using it to grow the country’s export economy.
China gains a trade advantage by making clean energy cheaper. Lower costs allow these clean technologies to access international markets easily.
Since 2018, China has shipped out close to US$1 trillion worth of batteries, solar components, electric vehicles (EVs) and wind power systems globally. But some of these industries are facing overcapacity, so China must find new markets for its products.
Its traditional markets, Europe and the United States, have recently added trade barriers, including tariffs on Chinese EVs and solar panels.
At COP30, China used global climate negotiations to set out its opposition to these barriers, positioning free trade in clean technologies as essential for reaching global climate goals. But they are also ideal for Chinese economic growth.
Shipping to other emerging markets is an alternative to these more established markets. China’s EVs exports to South-East Asia saw explosive growth in 2025.
Its new customers are large, energy-intensive economies such as Indonesia and India. China wants to keep them and everybody else committed to net-zero emissions to maximise its clean tech trade benefits.
Regional security is another. China hopes to increase its political power in countries and regions of strategic interest, such as via its economic and trade partnership, the Belt and Road Initiative, and also in the Pacific.
It has already increased its investments in new security allies, such the Solomon Islands and the Cook Islands.
To repackage this strategy under the name of climate change, China launched the China-Pacific Island Countries Climate Change Cooperation Centre in 2022. Addressing global climate change enables China to legitimise its involvement in these countries and regions.
China is being seen as stepping up to a leadership position on climate change. But assuming full leadership and historical responsibilities for climate change are beyond its comfort zone. China’s delegates entered COP30 meeting rooms being praised for new leadership, but Beijing is struggling to meet its current pledges.
The latest analysis suggests that its carbon emissions are falling slowly. The country’s emission reduction pledges, announced ahead of COP30, are regarded as insufficient.
Biggest threat
The biggest threat is its own economy – weak factory output, low consumer spending, high youth unemployment and lower state taxation to encourage growth.
Local governments have difficulties in financing the low-carbon economy, and their debts are accumulating.
It’s not clear whether China can fulfill its pledges by cutting emissions sharply, continue to subsidise its green energy industries and make significant economic investments in regional cooperation, all under its current weak economy.
So China does not want to lead as an advocate of deep emission cuts nor does it want to take on the mantle with other industrialised economies of accepting the historical responsibility for global climate change.
Analysis has shown that, despite being far behind the United States, China’s historical emissions since 1850 have overtaken those from the 27 EU member states.
The closer China comes to the United States’ traditional role, the more it will be expected to take historical responsibility for climate change.
China is not ready for that. It cannot reduce emissions significantly in a short timeframe under a weak economy. China sees itself as a developing country.
At COP30, one of the contentious issues was getting US$1.3 trillion per year in climate finance from public and private sources in the EU and other OECD economies.
China did not formally commit to supporting the US$1.3 trillion goal, disappointing the rest of the developing world.
The lack of commitment was not just a matter of money but the idea that China should be held responsible in the same terms as developed countries.
While it has provided a substantial amount of climate and clean energy finance to other developing countries, this was primarily driven by strategic and geopolitical considerations.
China also opposed the road map aimed at phasing out fossil fuels and declined to contribute to Brazil’s Tropical Forest Forever Facility, a mechanism for compensating countries for preserving tropical forests.
Clearly, China is leading the world in low-carbon technologies. It also believes that climate cooperation with developing nations will deliver trade and security benefits, and will continue to shape climate change talks along these lines. — The Jakarta Post/ANN
Alex Lo is a professor of environment at York St John University. The views expressed here are the writer’s own.
Article by ALEX LO
Source: Why China is hesitant on global green leadership (Wednesday, 03 Dec 2025). The Star. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/business/insight/2025/12/03/why-china-is-hesitant-on-global-green-leadership
Disclaimer
The information provided in this report is of a general nature and has been prepared for information purposes only. It is not intended to constitute research or as advice for any investor. The information in this report is not and should not be construed or considered as an offer, recommendation or solicitation for investments. Investors are advised to make their own independent evaluation of the information contained in this report, consider their own individual investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs and should seek appropriate personalised financial advice from a qualified professional to suit individual circumstances and risk profile. The information contained in this report is prepared from data believed to be correct and reliable at the time of issuance of this report. While every effort is made to ensure the information is up-to-date and correct, Bond and Sukuk Information Platform Sdn Bhd (“the Company”) does not make any guarantee, representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the adequacy, accuracy, completeness, reliability or fairness of any such information contained in this report and accordingly, neither the Company nor any of its affiliates nor its related persons shall not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any consequences (including but not limited to any direct, indirect or consequential losses, loss of profits and damages) of any reliance thereon or usage thereof.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
ARTICLE
Why China is hesitant on global green leadership
Dec 03, 2025
|
6 min read
ARTICLE
AI bond deluge forces some to seek MBS shelter
Dec 03, 2025
|
5 min read
ARTICLE
Accelerating South-East Asia’s Green Transition
Dec 02, 2025
|
6 min read
ARTICLE
Ringgit bonds set to draw more foreign funds
Dec 01, 2025
|
6 min read